Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

125721

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am firmly opposed to removing environmental assessment requirements for the Eagle’s Nest mine. This project lies in Ontario’s ecologically sensitive Ring of Fire—home to endangered species and globally significant wetlands. The scope of the project demands more—not less—scrutiny. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

126501

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am firmly opposed to removing environmental assessment requirements for the Eagle’s Nest mine. This project lies in Ontario’s ecologically sensitive Ring of Fire—home to endangered species and globally significant wetlands. The scope of the project demands more—not less—scrutiny. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

127290

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I ask that the Eagle's Nest Mine Project not be amended to bypass a comprehensive Environmental Assessment. Given the sensitive conditions in the Ring of Fire proper precautions must be undertaken before proceeding. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

128667

Commentaire fait au nom

Climate Action Newmarket Aurora

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Initial public consultation concerns: Proposed Bill 5, “Protecting Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act” is split into 10 different schedules and whereby some schedules have a different ERO reference number of input and others do not (Schedules 1, 4 & 8) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

129324

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is a fully ridiculous proposal that proposes to forego an environmental assessment for a major mining project in an area of high ecological integrity, and one that is providing important nature-based climate change mitigation services. What could go wrong? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

136525

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hello I have serious concerns about the Eagles Nest ( Ring of Fire) mining project and Bill 5. With the Province’s Environmental Oversight changes how will you address the following:    Will the dewatering mining process be used in Eagle's Nest? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

136804

Commentaire fait au nom

Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA)

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA) is providing the following 2 files on Bill 5: - cover letter dated May 8, 2025 attaching - submissions dated May 2025 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

140648

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
My concerns and comments are as follows: 1. The mine is to be located totally underground, with tailings disposal underground as well. However, this still calls for a rigorous assessment of the environmental impacts to the subsurface, including permafrost and subsurface hydrogeology. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

140688

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
If the project's scope has drastically changed, it should undergo another comprehensive environmental assessment to ensure the protection of the environment, which people and animals depend on to survive. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

140731

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Getting rid of environmental protections to make profit for private companies is a shortsighted idea detrimental to future generations of Ontarians. This government has proven that they need supervision. They've consistently chosen to bolster private companies over the people of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

140918

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Eagle’s Nest mine project's new project scope should undergo a comprehensive environmental assessment. The project scope has changed significantly since 2015, nevertheless , the company agreed to a comprehensive environmental assessment and it should be completed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

141337

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I call for this proposal to be withdrawn. An EA of the Eagle's Nest Mine must proceed. If passed, Bill 5 would: * Terminate the environmental assessment for Eagle’s Nest mine - a proposed mining project in Treaty 9 lands, part of the proposed Ring of Fire. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

141741

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
To me, this proposal would unjustifiably elimiate an environmental assessment, which thus eliminates a comprehensive assessment of the project's potential impacts and risks to water, wildlife, and human health, among other factors. Lire davantage