Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

177538

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposed change will not enhance the already-strained public environment services. Lessening the local oversight into a smaller conglomerate will affect each area in a negative capacity that will provide any fixes to any of the ongoing problems. Read more

Comment ID

177540

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am completely against this proposal as it will ultimately lead to a reduction in funding, reduced local activities specific to the area, it will lead to higher fees for many locations, and I fear it will also weaken wildlife protections. Read more

Comment ID

177542

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Reducing the number of authorities based on the concept of "The current system of 36 separate conservation authorities is fragmented, with each conservation authority following different policies, standards, fees and levels of staffing and technical capabilities," means that you remove the right to Read more

Comment ID

177544

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Centralization should always be assumed to be a bad idea and then justified against this assuming. The reason that all centralization needs justification is that as organizations become more centralized they care less and less about the local individuals they serve. Read more

Comment ID

177545

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Our province is vast. Every region has unique challenges facing both development and the preservation of our natural spaces. Having independent conservation authorities allows proper management of this resource from experts who know their unique area. Read more

Comment ID

177547

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a ridiculous idea. It assumes all parks have the same environment, the same needs the same community that uses it. Stop looking to make cuts to services and taxes, the government is not a business, it provides services to its constituents. Read more

Comment ID

177549

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I believe that this proposal should not go through. It's important that local water be handled by local authority as they would be able to respond quickest and with the most familiarity to any issues that may arise

Comment ID

177552

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Lifelong resident of Ontario here, this is a hideous proposal that NO ONE IS ASKING FOR, that will do nothing but at best make a larger red tape barrier, at worst is handing important land and water rights to certain corporate interests (who I think pay Doug Ford very well for this sort of proposed Read more

Comment ID

177554

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Completely insane that anyone would think these regions should cover such large areas. How could any organization effectively operate a region for example from Kingston to Ottawa and Summerstown just because "their water enters the St. Lawrence". Read more

Comment ID

177555

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You have no credibility to enact legislation like this, because you don't tell the truth. Whatever reason you're actually doing it for, you're not going to tell us, therefore we have no basis to evaluate the legislation. Read more

Comment ID

177556

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I hold multiple degrees in environmental science, including a master of science in with specialization in fluvial geomorphology. I can say without a doubt this is a bad move for the province. The conservation authorities are integral to the long-term health of the province and it's people. Read more

Comment ID

177558

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a bad idea. You need local authorities to monitor their own areas. We can’t allow this government to dilute environmental responsibility. The government is supposed to serve the people, not create back doors for rich businesses to profit from the depletion of our natural environment. Read more

Comment ID

177559

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This sort of policy is not only exposing thousands of us to flooding and irreparable damage to the environment but is going to lead to there not being enough staff, planning or oversight in specific regions. Read more