Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

178768

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do NOT proceed with this consolidation. The conservation authorities are fine the way they are. If anything, they can work on streamlining their jurisdictions amongst themselves. We need MORE authorities and less government interference.

Comment ID

178769

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Local oversight by local conservation authority infinitely more desirable than out-of-district oversight. . Expanding boundaries which negate/ignore local input detrimental. I disagree with consolidation.

Comment ID

178770

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Reduce the Size of the Proposed Region – The proposed Lake Erie Regional Conservation Authority — covering 8 conservation authorities and 81 municipalities — is much too large to remain responsive and effective. Read more

Comment ID

178771

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am vehemently opposed to this. There are too many differences in the environmental areas being amalgamated. Carolinian forests, two very different great lakes, inland regions vs coastal. Small CAs allow for expertise and specialization. Read more

Comment ID

178772

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
J’aimerais, à titre de membre de Boisés Est ( Association de propriétaires francophone de forêt de l’Est de l’Ontario ) possédant 200 membres et gérant collectivement environ 10 000 acres de forêts à l’extrémité Est de la province, vous partagez les commentaires suivants en ce qui concerne la Propos Read more

Comment ID

178773

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Large administrative boundaries could represent an issue when taking about technical decision making, also it could impact the time response frame regarding the enforcement of the environmental law, planning process, and community programs.

Comment ID

178774

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are a massive country. Ontario is a massive province. I think the amalgamation of conservation authorities is misguided. My fear is it eliminates environmental checks and balances that come with local knowledge and awareness. It put our most valuable resources, soil and water at risk. Read more

Comment ID

178776

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have concerns with Bill 68. Please consider the wildlife and conservation areas' expertise being affected by this merge. Some species may go extinct and this bill will block the wisdom for rural landowners and farmers. Please reconsider.

Comment ID

178777

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are facing an ecological crisis. This is undeniable. We need more people working on this, not fewer. We need more conservation authorities, not fewer. This consolidation idea is absurd on its face.

Comment ID

178779

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am commenting on the Conservation Authority Amalgamation as proposed in ERO 025-1257. I do not agree with the proposal to consolidate Ontario’s 36 Conservation Authorities (CA, CAs) into 7 regional ones under the proposed Ontario Provincial Conservation Agency (OPCA). Read more

Comment ID

178781

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Conservation Halton has been a valuable resource for the community. Protecting our parks and monitoring our watershed areas are crucial as we move into more unpredictable climate conditions. Read more

Comment ID

178782

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
With increased wild weather and climate change impacting our communities, now is the time to enhance conservation measures rather than consolidate or weaken conservation. Greenspace, waterways, wetlands and forests are increasingly important on the front lines of climate change. Read more

Comment ID

178783

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Each of the current Conservation authorities have expertise and experience in their own local service areas. To expect that the public would have the same level of service and expertise to continue under some sort of “consolidation “ plan would be highly unlikely. Read more

Comment ID

178785

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please leave our water shed issues and Boundaries to conservation authorities. Do not pass on this bill it could negatively impact society, increase risk of disasters, and negatively impact the environment.

Comment ID

178786

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing this comment to provide my feedback as an Ontario-born naturalist in regards to the incredibly short-sighted and misguided proposal to consolidate our 36 Conservation Areas (CAs) across the province. Read more

Comment ID

178788

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The existing Conservation Authority (CA) system—comprised of 36 distinct Conservation Authorities operating collaboratively through Conservation Ontario—is a proven, effective, and internationally respected model of watershed-based environmental management. Read more