Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150632

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Extremely opposed to this as a frequent user and local resident near the Saugeen river. This will negatively impact the river, which is used by thousands of residents and tourists throughout the year. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150634

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Clean water is a right not enjoyed by many people, mostly Indigenous, in our community. Gravel washing will take and pollute this very precious gift of the Earth, putting many lives at risk in and beyond the Saugeen community. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150638

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Commenting on the Walker Put application for a permit to take water in a Category 3 with serious potential to harm the environment. I vehemently oppose this permit as it has potential to damage local ecology just to wash gravel?! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150643

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I object to the proposal from Walker Aggregates Inc. to be allowed to take 7,920,000 litres of water per day, every day of the year, for ten years, to wash aggregates at its pit at 381769 Concession 4 Road in Hanover, Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150646

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
After reading through the proposal summary it is very clear to me that it makes the case for NOT approving this new permit. The proposal states that , if approved, it will have the ' highest potential of causing unacceptable environmental impactor interference'. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150649

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
vote no for Walkers to use the Pond Water. Find/think of another way... I'm sure if you actually put your mind to it, there is a better way. KEEP THINKING,NO MORE EXCUSES. ALL THIS RUN AROUND WE CONTINUE TO HEAR IS BECOMING A BIT MUCH DON'T YOU THINK? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150656

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a First Nation member residing on watershed sacred island mountain also known as southwestern Ontario in so called grey county prohibit the walker corporation from extracting water 24-7 there was no consultation Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150663

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As is well known, a Permit to take Water, or PTTW, can have a broad reaching impact. Of vital importance is the depth of the pond and the level to which the water will be drawn, as this will be the determining factor in the cone of influence of the drawdown. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150678

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a resident that lives close to this impacted site. I have significant concerns that this is a category 3 that is anticipated to have the highest potential of causing unacceptable environmental impactor interference. Our entire community and many in surrounding areas rely solely on well water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150680

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
There is a lot of pressure to license even more gravel pits in the vicinity of the Walker operation and so it is somewhat shocking that a water taking application of this magnitude: up to 7,920 000 litres daily , every day for 10 years- can just be applied for as an amendment to a license without n Lire davantage