Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66895

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I may be young but even I know that this a terrible plan. We already have enough space for everyone in Canada with the spaces already built up. Just continue building them up, we don’t need sprawl. All that does is add more taxes needed to fund next years count. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66896

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The original intent of the green space is that it would be protected as such for now and future generations. The provincial and municipal governments have not made significant attempts to create policy and regulations to re zone existing residential development to include greater density. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66897

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is essential that our Greebelt is protected and that we look at alternatives. Doug Ford promised to leave it alone and now he is proving that he is a complete liar and doesn’t care about integrity, honesty or the people of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66898

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

During the election, it was brought forth the plan to build on the Greenbelt. This was greatly opposed to by the people. As such, it was removed from the platform and we were promised this would not happen. And yet, here we are. This is a very bad idea and I do not support it at all. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66899

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt needs to stay intact. Allowing any part of it to be "repurposed" or blatantly destroyed will only open up a standard that more of it can be. This is a gateway to both ecoterrorism by way of deforestation, pollution, habitat destruction, and so much more. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66900

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have a concern with using protected lands for development. These are important areas and we must protect them and our environment. I against using even the smallest parts of the greenbelt for development.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66901

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

No. Canada is a vast country. There’s no reason you need to take protected land. Toronto is not the only city in Canada or even Ontario that matters. Develop other cities to be great so ppl want to live near somewhere other than Toronto.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66905

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not want this swap to happen. The solutions to housing need to maintain the quality of life and ABS the quality of the air near the high density areas. There are ate other housing solutions that do not harm the Greenbelt.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66906

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am completely opposed to this proposal. The greenbelt needs to continue to be protected and turning it into residential development land will not be the solution to the housing crisis unless there are also big changes to zoning by-laws that allow for high-density housing to be built. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66908

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We must not allow our green spaces to be sacrificed for monetary gain. We need to start taking tangible actions to address the climate crisis, and it starts by preserving our nature. I DO NOT support the amendment to the Greenbelt Plan.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66911

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Our green belt is there for a reason. Blind adherence to economic growth in the face of environmental constraints is the height of hubris. We have a systems that requires a house in order to have any financial stability or to retire peacefully. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66914

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think the developers involved in this project should be investigated and the ties to Doug Ford. Who is going to benefit from this project? Will these be at-least affordable housing, multi unit housing? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66915

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not build on protected Greenlands. We need to protect these spaces. The environmental impact will be insurmountable. Please focus on densifying existing areas. Do not do this to us, young people and screw up the future of the planet even more than it already has been.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66916

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Destroying environmentally protected land to build “affordable housing” is ridiculous. What was the point of the Greenbelt? To call it protected for later use? I know the government I’m not voting for next election.