Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73871

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Don’t develop the green belt. It’s so ecologically important, paving over it would be disastrous. The gta is large enough and there are tons of empty lots that can be turned into homes. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73872

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I think this is a bad idea and am against the proposal. Yes we need more housing and you've been given recommendations that can do this without going into the greenbelt. We're already trying to combat the effects of climate change, don't make it worse simply to make profit for corporations. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73873

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please reread your own task force’s report it states that development in the green belt isn’t needed no would make a significant impact in getting us more houses. Why bother with a report if you were just going to ignore it and waste tax payer dollars on it? Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73874

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This plan is an ecological disaster that will do nothing to ameliorate the housing crisis. We need changes to density and an end to single family housing zoning. By paving the greenbelt we open residents to flooding and we are going to cripple our food production during a period of climate change. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73875

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is an embarrassment. Public land should serve the public not politicians political buddies. Where the guarantee this land/housing will benefit the people Where the guarantee they wont build large unaffordable (for most) homes and just rent them out at extremely high rates. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73878

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am opposed to development on the greenbelt. One farmland and natural area have been developed there is no way to get that land back. The loss of vital farm land, wetlands, and other environmentally sensitive areas will negatively impact Ontario for ever. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73882

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is an embarrassment. It is a detriment to the green belt, the province, the environment, and the people. Our world is in dire shape. We need to leave our protected land as is ( or increase it’s size). Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73886

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developped, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73887

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I question the density of housing that will be built on this land. Large properties with detached homes for the wealthy are not worth sacrificing the greenbelt for and will do little to ease the housing crises which is affecting those with less means. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73888

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Disgusting and criminal. This is a cash grab for wealthy developers. Sacrificing our environment to make the rich richer. This will not solve the housing crisis. We need to increase density and stop building single detached homes. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73889

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. Lire davantage

Related actions

Commentaire sur

Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73891

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is not grounded in public interest it is based in the interests of enriching developer. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. There is a grave need in Ontario for affordable housing and support for first time homebuyers, this addressed none of those needs. Lire davantage

Related actions