Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83323

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As someone who lives on lakefront property on Lake of the Woods, floating accommodations have increased immensely over the past 5 years. As rising property costs continue to increase more and more people are choosing a floating home to replace a cottage and 'life on the lake' access. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83329

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These floating “cottages” are a danger to our environment and any approval that would allow them to exist on our lakes gives the individual promoting them a way to circumvent the systems we have in place to protect our land, our people and the wildlife in the area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83330

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a cottage owner on the Trent Severn Waterway, I object to these floating accommodations concurring with all of the concerns delineated. I support the legislative changes that address these concerns.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83332

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have been an annual visitor to Lake Temagami for over 50 years, and I am the fourth generation in my family to consider the lake a home away from home. The near wilderness-type experience that I have at Lake Temagami has shaped who I am as a person. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83338

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Regarding ERO number 019-6590 Floating Accommodations. I am in support of the new proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83341

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The cost of buying a cottage or house on the lake has made it unaffordable for most. Why should this just be limited to the wealthy to enjoy our lakes. I think they should be allowed with perhaps some restrictions

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83347

Commentaire fait au nom

Sturgeon Point Association

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached a letter from the Sturgeon Point Association regarding the proposed amendments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83356

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a property owner and full time resident living on Sturgeon Lake, I fully support the proposal to add a new condition to prohibit camping on water within 300 meters of a developed shoreline, provided that the OPP and other agencies are able to enforce the limit when required. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83377

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I was VERY DISTURBED to read that you are removing the real value in the previous version of your proposed changes. The following SHOULD BE INCLUDED in the changes: reducing the number of days that a person can camp on water at one location in each calendar year from 21 days to 7 days, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83378

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In B.C. Transport Canada has designated them as float homes thereby, allowing municipalities to utilize by-laws to regulate. Transport Canada has developed standards for float homes in B.C. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83380

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I completely supported the initial changes as proposed by MNRF but this process has become very confusing. The comment period for the original proposal expired April 11, but it appears you have already significantly modified the original proposal before the commenting period is over. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83457

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am strongly opposed to floating container homes on environmental, equity, and aesthetic grounds. If they were to proliferate on Ontario's lakes and rivers, they would inevitably worsen the environment. Water quality would suffer due to untreated waste water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83459

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm in support of the proposed exclusions, whereby floating accommodations or float homes are not considered as “camping units” and thusly cannot be placed and used for overnight accommodation on water over public land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83464

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

in support of the proposed exclusions, whereby floating accommodations or float homes are not considered as “camping units” and thusly cannot be placed and used for overnight accommodation on water over public land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83488

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am in support of FOCA's response which encourages the proposed exclusions, whereby floating accommodations or float homes are not considered as “camping units” and thus, cannot be placed and used for overnight accommodation on water over public land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83491

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am in support of FOCA's response which encourages the proposed exclusions, whereby floating accommodations or float homes are not considered as “camping units” and thus, cannot be placed and used for overnight accommodation on water over public land. Lire davantage