Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92846

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a resident of Tyendinaga Township, and living close to Long's and Melrose Quarry, why would this permit even be entertained? There are many homes in the area who depend on their wells!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92848

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Community relies on this water of which there can be periods of short supply. No individual landowner should be allowed to consume as much as is being requested at the detriment of others. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92875

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not agree this change, should NOT be approved let alone as a category 3. This area is not on well water and aquifer is variable. There are summers where local area have gone dry and this action would impact ability to access water year round.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92877

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

To whom it may concern: As a resident who lives within 2 km of the quarry we have great concern over the stability and longevity of our water supply. Water is not something we take for granted. It is essential to survival. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92878

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commenting as a resident on an adjacent road, a family that will be greatly impacted by the proposal of a category 3 permit to take water. I do not support this proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92913

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm absolutely floored that this is even being talked about. A category 3 should NEVER even be talked about, if it is going to cause any issues at all. That's unethical and unreasonable to do the citizens in the township. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92919

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I certainly oppose the granting this permit to take water at a Category 3 level 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. I'm very concerned about the long term adverse environmental impact to wildlife in the area and overall water sustainability and cleanliness to all life in the Shannonville area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92941

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are quite concerned for everyone's wells. Will this company pay to refill our wells when we run put of water due to your taking our water? This is unacceptable. Just because we are rural does not give you the right to take our water. We need our water to survive. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92990

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a resident, I am extremely concerned about this proposal. Our water source is a fragile commodity, one we shouldn't waste. This is already listed as a category 3, and consideration to expand the amount of water taking is both foolish and short-sighted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93005

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello I am concerned about the long term repercussions of this proposal. A Level 3 puts us all at risk of not having resources. Will there be a community out reach an vote? Alongside visibility on long term side effects, also where is the water taken to? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93039

Commentaire fait au nom

CAMQ - Citizens Against Melrose Quarry

Statut du commentaire

September 1, 2023 Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Client Services and Permissions Branch 135 St. Clair Ave West 1st Floor Toronto, Ontario M4V 1P5 Re: ERO 019-7489, C. H. Demill Holdings Inc, Permit to Take Water. Ministry Reference Number 4702-CUKQSA Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93089

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to this proposal to take water (amendment). As a resident I am deeply concerned for the impact on the local water table which is under significant strain currently. I think it is excessively exploitive and unsustainable.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93091

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposal is a Category 3 permit level. How can this even be considered then? The onus should be on the business requesting this, to prove it will not be an issue for drinking water quality, the environment, impact to wildlife etc. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93105

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to Demill’s application to dewater Long’s quarry. The amount of water suggested is apt to turn the local groundwater reserves into a dust bowl. All of the neighbours depend on this groundwater to enable human and animal drinking, washing and flushing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93112

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a very very very bad plan and should never ever be approved. It will have drastic effects on the environment. With what they are taking out of the water table now some of the ponds that never ever went dry in the hottest summers are now drying up in the summer. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93117

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a resident of Tyendinaga township, I oppose this proposal. I live a few Kilometres from this site and already have to bring water in during the summers to subsidize my well, as do many of my neighbours. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93121

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live on Melrose Road. There are 3 categories and the permit Demill holdings is proposing is a category 3. This is very concerning. The water going back into the ground could be contaminated and could cause environmental issues. Why is this being allowed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93122

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Living within 2km of Longs Quarry, we are concerned with our well. We have a hand dug 23' well that has presumably been used since the house was built in 1893. We currently have livestock on our 172 acre property. Lire davantage