Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94891

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Return all Greenbelt lands that should never have been for sale in the first place. This is a deeply unpopular move even among Conservative voters.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94892

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Public Health Association

Statut du commentaire

The Ontario Public Health Association (OPHA) supports the proposal to return lands to the Greenbelt and urges the Government to restore full and permanent protection to these lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94895

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 136, the Greenbelt Statute Law Amendment Act must: -legislate that the 10-year Greenbelt Reviews can only ADD lands to the Greenbelt with NO land removals and NO land swaps; -ensure meaningful First Nations consultation; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94896

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Good day We live here in Ancaster in book Road , since 2014, our area wasn't designated to green belt and suddenly without notice became as a part of green belt on 2016. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94897

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerning about book road, shaver and Fiddlers Green area: This change from greenbelt to urban is necessary for this area, as fallow: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94898

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I request the following amendments be included in the final version of the legislation. > Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94899

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

November 24, 2023 The Honourable Paul Calandra Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing 17th Floor, 777 Bay Street Toronto, ON M7A 2J3 Dear Minister Calandra, Re: Bill 136 – Greenbelt Lands Reversal Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94901

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My wife & I own 10 acres within the Greenbelt lands in Ancaster (Hamilton). We wish to share our comments on the Greenbelt designation process and proposed Bill 136. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94902

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a resident of the Book Road Group, I would like to comment on the proposal to return these lands into the Greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94903

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Doug Ford's presumption that 'people don't care' about the redesignation of land to the greenbelt is further evidence that this bill is needed to protect and restore our natural and public spaces. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94905

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please be advised the Greenbelt Statute Law Amendment Act is not sufficient to protect the Greenbelt for future generations. Specifically: - it does not close procedural loopholes for Greenbelt removals during ten-year review periods; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94906

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Hamilton

Statut du commentaire

As detailed in the enclosed submission the City of Hamilton supports the reinstatement of these lands to the Greenbelt Area. The City has submitted additional detailed comments which are also enclosed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94907

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My comments are as follows: 1) Legislate that in the 10-year Greenbelt review, outside of minor housekeeping, any amendments to boundaries can only add lands to the Greenbelt with no possibility for land swaps. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94908

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt structure along with the policies are unfair to actual farmers who own the land. We have never been shown any reports to why our land was included. We have no water, no animal migration pattern and our land is poor quality farm land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94909

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am particularly concerned about the protection of the Duffins Rouge Agricultural preserve. In this time of climate change and local food crisis, we have to protect this Class 1 farmland, adjacent to the Rouge park, and rich in wetlands, creeks and ecological diversity. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94910

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is excruciating knowing the short span liability of our politicians minds. Driven by the need for new homes that are required for the influx of New Canadians & the existing lack of affordable homes for our present population the decision makes are very short sighted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94911

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are grateful to the people who originally had the vision to create the Greenbelt Plan. Their foresight was truly profound. Green spaces that are the lungs of Southern Ontario, home to wildlife, agriculture, rivers, springs and wetlands, were to be protected and enjoyed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94914

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am extremely concerned about the protection of the Duffins Rouge Agricultural preserve. In this time of climate change and local food crisis, we have to protect this Class 1 farmland, adjacent to the Rouge park, and rich in wetlands, creeks and ecological diversity. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94917

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a supplement to my previous comments and as a counterpoint to comments that have or will be coming from the Town of Grimsby, who are requesting that the parcels in the Town, that being parcels at 502 Winston Road and Cline Road in Grimsby, not be re-included as part of Bill 136, I would like to o Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94918

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This amendment should have a public consultation process. I agree the lands must be placed back in. I disagree with this amendment where land adjustments will be a solely political process. This opens possibilities for another majority government to vote for land removal or illegitimate land swaps. Lire davantage