Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149518

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With regards to Pro's entering an agreement with Municipalities for collection for small businesses I am hoping this includes all non-eligible sources under the Institutional, Industrial and Commercial Properties. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149967

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Amending RRCEA to allow the Government to develop a regulation requiring producers to offer pricing to municipalities for providing blue box service to small businesses is essential. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150013

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Southgate

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Allow the Minister to order RPRA to gather information from specified parties  Support the amendment enabling the Minister to direct RPRA to gather cost data from specified parties, that data be used to enhance program fairness and transparency. 2 Enable regulations to Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150236

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Peterborough Downtown Business Improvement Area (DBIA) welcomes the Ministry’s recognition of opportunities to improve efficiency in blue box collection by better integrating small businesses, particularly those Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150251

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
While good in theory, these changes seem to be causing confusion and likely more costs for municipalities -- both of which are recurring themes with this gov -- and less effective recycling. Saying the words 'transparency' and 'accountability' in all amendments does not make them true. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150325

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Our cities and regions are filthy enough, increasing costs for private trucks to pick up recycling at NES is ludicrist. There is going to be an overflow of garbage/recycling when NES cant afford the increases. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150402

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the Township of Strong

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Township of Strong appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on ERO #025-0536 regarding the proposed amendments to the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016 (RRCEA). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150405

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
1. Service to more multi-residential buildings: Since multi-res buildings are sources of residential blue box materials, the Province should not eliminate the requirement for producers to service buildings not currently serviced by municipalities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150672

Commentaire fait au nom

County of Simcoe

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please find attached comments from the County of Simcoe regarding the proposed amendments to the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150673

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Richmond Hill

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
City of Richmond Hill's formal comments on the proposed amendments to the RRCEA are attached as a separate file. Below is a summary of the comments: Increasing transparency on costs and system data Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150695

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Resource Recovery and Circular Economy MUST NOT be delayed! I am appalled by manufacturers being allowed to use black plastic when black plastic is NOT recyclable, e.g. take out containers - make consumers bring their own from home or switch to cardboard or aluminum. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150733

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Inflexibility for rural depot recycling is leading to more cost, less efficient processes and loss of convenience. Buy in for recycling is linked to convenience. If less convenient for blue box and special waste it will end up in the landfill. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150813

Commentaire fait au nom

The Township of North Glengarry

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
1. Amendment Fails to Advance Circular Economy Goals The amendment does not help achieve a true circular economy. It relies on municipalities to provide waste collection for small businesses and organizations, subsidizing large corporate polluters. 2. 'Polluter Pays' Principle Undermined Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150818

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Renfrew

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Town of Renfrew supports the inclusion of small business, community facilities and not-for profit organizations in the common collection system. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150824

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the City of Greater Sudbury

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The City of Greater Sudbury appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the proposed amendments to the Blue Box Regulation (ERO #: 025-0009) and the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016 (ERO #: 025-0536). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150826

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Guelph

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please find attached the comments from the City of Guelph regarding the proposed amendments to the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016, as well as related amendments to the Blue Box Regulation (ERO 025-0009). Lire davantage