Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172620

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Hamilton

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Minister to Require Input on Standards Support Transportation Planning: Will provide consistent criteria across municipalities which will assist with road design and multi-modal infrastructure integration between neighbouring municipalities. Concerns HSR: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172631

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Guelph

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please see attached the City of Guelph's comments regarding this proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172634

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Toronto, Engineering & Construction Division

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
City of Toronto, Engineering & Construction Services (ECS) has significant concerns about the proposal to implement mandatory common municipal road construction standards. We appreciate the opportunity to outline the challenges and explain why we do not support this proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172636

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is a really terrible idea, and we don't want it to pass. Cancel the proposals under Bill 60, this is top-down, way too much provincial interference in municipal transportation matters. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172645

Commentaire fait au nom

London Development Institute

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please see attached letter from London Development Institute Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172647

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
No, this is a bad idea. Please don't pass this. We don't want it. I don't want the tax burden of having to always build cycling infrastructure in the boulevard, it's going to take forever and be so expensive. We want quick build infrastructure to making cycling safe and enjoyable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172663

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Markham

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
1) The Province should provide further clarity on what aspects of contracts pertaining to road and bridge construction the Minister is allowed to govern. The scope is currently unclear and if the Minister is able to govern beyond the technical aspect of contracts. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172718

Commentaire fait au nom

Halton Region

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide feedback on the proposed development of harmonized road construction standards and changes to the Public Transportation Highway Improvement Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172742

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Brampton

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Subject: City of Brampton Response to ERO 025-1140: Amendments to the Public Transportation and Highway Improvement Act To Whom It May Concern, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172773

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association (OSWCA)

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Ontario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association (OSWCA) represents more than 850 companies and 30,000 skilled workers who build and maintain water, wastewater, road, and bridge infrastructure that supports communities across Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172800

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Dear Ministry: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Province’s ERO 025-1140 posting related to amendments to the Public Transportation and Highway Improvements Act. See below for Town of Caledon comments on this posting: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172807

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
REFERENCE: ERO 025-1140: Bill 60 - Fighting Delays, Building Faster Act, 2025 – Supporting the Harmonization of Municipal Road Construction Standards Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172816

Commentaire fait au nom

Peel Region

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
November 17, 2025 Ministry of Transportation Environmental Policy Office 438 University Ave 12th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 1N3 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172954

Commentaire fait au nom

The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please find attached AMO's submission to this particular posting along with various other Environmental Registry of Ontario and Regulatory Registry postings. Please refer to the table of contents on page two for the applicable section from this larger submission. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173083

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Cancel this. Do not pass it. Do not support it. It's completely backwards and taking the province in the wrong direction. There are 10,000 reasons to build for safe and enjoyable cycling and you're making that impossible, more expensive and taking way longer. Please just stop.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173087

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Professional Planners Institute

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
A submission from the Ontario Professional Planners Institute sub-committee of transportation planners. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173102

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo supports continuing its practice of utilizing OPSS.MUNI and OPSD standards as much as possible, amending only where required for specific flatwork, watermain, storm sewer or sanitary sewer works for design, construction or O&M intent/purpose/need. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173156

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is shortsighted and hostile to alternative forms of transportation that would go much further toward reducing delays and congestion, (such as bike lanes). I do not support its adoption.