Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158524

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Protect natural habitat and wild species, not rich destroyers/"developers" !!!! Ford has no shame or decency !!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158530

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I oppose putting economic growth ahead of species protection! If there is no environment, there is no economy. PROTECT EVIDENCE-BASED CONSERVATION. Don't narrow the definition of 'habitat.' Reinstate the Advisory Committee. Reverse the exclusion of aquatic species and migratory birds. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158532

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I strongly disagree with rescinding this legislation that protect species at risk. Many of these species are foundstional to the environment and can not be comprimised for rammed through poorly planned extraction projects.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158534

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Seriously? Its one thing to update regulations its another to rewrite regulations to appease the politics of a party that is lining its pockets, on your backs. Grow a spine already.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158536

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Im very concerned and do not support narrowing the definition of “habitat”. Scientific findings should not be politically vetoed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158556

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
-Reverse the exclusion of aquatic species & migratory birds! They deserve provincial protection too and contribute to a healthy and secure ecosystem. -Stop the exemption of permits from public comment. Transparency is non-negotiable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Replacing the ESA with the much weaker SCA is irresponsible and short sighted. At this time of ever-growing human impact on our environment, it is essential that the laws protecting vulnerable species remain strong. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158563

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Stop the exemption of permits from public comment. Transparency is non-negotiable. Scientific findings shouldn't be politically vetoed. Protect evidence-based conservation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158596

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is evil and unconscionable. We are in a climate crisis and rapidly losing the biodiversity we all rely on for survival. Perhaps Doug Ford doesn’t understand this, but all life is interconnected and we can’t afford to remove the few protections we have for our most vulnerable wildlife.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158601

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I oppose putting economic growth ahead of species protection!! Scientific findings shouldn't be politically vetoed!! Protect evidence-based conservation! Don't narrow the definition of 'habitat,' recovery depends on future restoration zones Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158604

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hello, While there are lots of words in this that claim protection to species will continue, it certainly is a reduction in the actual protection and makes it very easy to exempt activities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158625

Commentaire fait au nom

Hamilton Naturalists Club

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Hamilton Naturalists’ Club (HNC) is submitting the following comments about the Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025. HNC has several concerns and urges the provincial government to withdraw it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158627

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
If this passes, it makes so many species at risk. Canada is known its vast forests, fresh water and wild life. How much more are we going to destroy, for money. Probably everything but Ford’s lack or care for our biodiversity couldn’t be more evident. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158635

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I demand that Ontario: Withdraw the Species Conservation Act and restore the Endangered Species Act. Reassign all “Special Concern” species to the protected list and maintain provincial oversight for aquatic and migratory bird species. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158637

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Having read the EBR it presents as an adversary to biodiversity and the very essence of protection and preservation. Therefore any implementation will destroy any gains and achievements made to date. Therefore, it is imperative that this EBR: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158650

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Ontario needs to recognize species at risk and monitor their presence snd provude neaures to increase their numbers snd safety

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158656

Commentaire fait au nom

Climate Action Newmarket Aurora

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Climate Action Newmarket-Aurora is deeply concerned that the new Species Conservation Act (SCA), as outlined under ‘Bill 5’ and these amendments, risks weakening the safeguards that have long protected Ontario’s most vulnerable species and habitats, despite the intent to modernize and streamline Ont Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158678

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Protection for at risk migratory birds and aquatic species should be retained under provincial species at risk legislation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

158689

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
There are many issues with this proposal. The extremely limited definition of habitat is not reasonable; organisms need safe locations to feed, move, hibernate, and much more than just nest or breed. Lire davantage