Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182115

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182116

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The MZOs in question are not in the public interest and should not be issued.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182117

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I write to register my opposition to the issuance of MZOs for the transit oriented ghetto proposed for midtown Oakville. This project will destroy the character of our town and waste all of the taxpayer dollars that Oakville residents have invested in developing the superior OPA70. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182119

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I want to register my concern about the density of this project along with the new proposal on the south Service road at the old GE plant Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182120

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The MZOs in question are not in the public interest and should not be issued.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182121

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182122

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The infrastructure in Oakville cannot support the high density building that you are proposing. Traffic would be unbearable. Healthcare and schools are lacking.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182123

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182124

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am opposed to this proposal based on the following 5 reasons: Reason #1: Mega-Density. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182125

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Concerns with Proposed Minister’s Zoning Orders (MZOs) for Midtown Oakville Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182126

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
11 fifty plus storey towers in mid town with a density 2x that of Hong Kong, in area already gridlocked from 3-6 is total insanity. And why is your government focused on one and only one developer? This is hardly a housing initiative Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182127

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These MZOs represent a profound override of local democracy despite Oakville’s full compliance with provincial policies and proven track record of growth and housing development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182128

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
11 fifty plus storey towers in mid town with a density 2x that of Hong Kong, in area already gridlocked from 3-6 is total insanity. And why is your government focused on one and only one developer? This is hardly a housing initiative Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182129

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Why does the Provincial government think using 20th century tools will solve at 21st century housing shortage? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182130

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The proposed density is too high for the area. There is insufficient local transit, roads can barely accommodate current traffic. I doubt that current sewage and water supplies are sufficient.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182131

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182132

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We have lived in Oakville for over 75 years ( my wife and myself ) In the fifties the Town was small and everybody knew at least someone when walking through downtown. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182136

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I can understand the need for having Municipal Zoning Orders so the province can deal with municipalities that are behind in decisions or are neglecting to make decisions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182137

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am opposed to this proposal based on the following Mega-Density. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182138

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
025-1368, Transit-Oriented Community in Oakville The MZO ignore several keys items: 1. It ignores the views of the locally elected officials, and residents as already set out in OPA 70. 2. The density is excessive by comparison with all other developments. Lire davantage