Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

151112

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This amendment will deny concerned public interest, whether those concerns are expressed by NGOs or by Municiplaities , the right to be heard. There may be substantive issues that have become apparent subsequant to the issuing of the original permit. Read more

Comment ID

151123

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I write in strong opposition to ERO #025-0730, “Proposed changes to provide flexibility for water taking activities.” This proposal undermines the hard-won regulatory protections that exist to safeguard Ontario’s groundwater for the benefit of all peoples and ecosystems—not for corporate profiteerin Read more

Comment ID

151145

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Water is for Life, Not Profit. Permits must not be transferable. Ontario’s current rules rightly require that a new owner must apply for a new Permit to Take Water (PTTW). This process ensures: · Environmental assessment of changing conditions; Read more

Comment ID

151156

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Consent is not transferrable. Think of it in terms of relationships and it makes it crystal clear. It is not just the first time you gave consent so now it is always yes. It is not I gave consent to this person and they can pass that consent to others. Creepy right! Read more

Comment ID

151285

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I propose that the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) immediately withdraw its Environmental Registry proposal 025-0730, which would allow water taking permits to become transferable assets. Read more

Comment ID

151651

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. Water Taking Permits Must Not Be Treated as Transferable Assets The current requirement that new owners must apply for a new Permit to Take Water (PTTW) is essential to maintaining public trust and environmental integrity. Read more

Comment ID

151801

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not change the rules about permits to take water. Each new owner must apply for a new permit! A regulator needs to check the percentage of water for water bottling the new owner already takes. This could be a monopoly. Read more

Comment ID

151809

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
How is water permit transfer honoring Canadians what with climate change and our country burning down at all fair? We can't just blanket, 'this company has priviledges forever' ideologies. First it will force corporations to look at R and D with a different lens, and force ingenuity. Read more

Comment ID

151828

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I believe that all "taking water permits" should not be transferred when companies change hands or are sold. In fact, I believe all "taking water permits" should be cancelled as we are not completely sure just how much water is available in the aquifers. Read more

Comment ID

151836

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly against allowing water taking permits to be transferrable. Environmental assessments are critical, and this will circumvent the environmental assessment process. Aquifers are not bottomless, but the greed of companies is.

Comment ID

151840

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Do not change the current regulation. Underground water is not an infinite ressource, far from it. How will you know how much water is left in a specific water table if you don't keep track of who is removing the water and how much? Read more

Comment ID

151853

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I write to express strong opposition to the Proposed changes to provide flexibility for water taking activities. Water is a resource that is vital to human existence, both directly and indirectly as it is foundational to the web of life on earth. Read more

Comment ID

151854

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Water is a finite resource. Ground water, being out of sight, especially needs to be monitored particularly in times of drought and particularly because recharge areas for aquifers are being degraded by loss of wetlands and development. To fail to recognise these facts is gross negligence. Read more

Comment ID

151857

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am NOT in support of making these changes to the water -taking application process. Clean water is not limitless and with the climate crisis happening it is even more critical to evaluate carefully each application to take water. Read more

Comment ID

151865

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Water is life and I fundamentally oppose the proposed changes to water taking permits. If a new ownership group comes in, that is the ideal time to ensure what is being permitted is sustainable. Look at the state of water rights in the southwest of the USA. Read more