Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54170

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Going through with this project would be such a disservice to this community and would go against what this community represents. We thrive as a place that values time spent outdoors and all things nature. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54173

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not change the designation of this land on Con. 7. We live on a sensitive ecological region that is greatly important to the surrounding areas. The land in question sits on top of the Oak Ridges Moraine, and is part of our natural system for purifying and filtering water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54179

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I object to this being allowed. It will become a permanent change that endangers the Oak Ridges moraine & the surrounding environment. This should not become an industrial use site. The Oak Ridges moraine, once damaged , can not be replaced. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54183

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is so upsetting. We need to be doing more to preserve our natural resources, or there will be nothing left. Put a hard stop to this initiative with Miller - rehabilitate these lands for now, and for future generations. There should be no question. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54191

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

With a history of non compliance environmental concerns are clearly of zero priority to Miller. Coupled with their defiance to direction by increasing g their yard sizes they clearly is their intention to do as they see fit. A recipe for disaster. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54194

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal by Miller Paving is horrifying! If they bring fill from the GTA into their pits they will risk the aquifers that provide water for our town. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54201

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing this in objection to what is occurring at the Miller Boyington Pit #3. I have a family farm in the area; what is occurring at the Miller Boyington Pit #3 greatly concerns me. My biggest concern is how the environment is being impacted by these occurrences. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54212

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We hope the government supports the residents of Uxbridge and surrounding communities by supporting less industrial activity and mining related activity in and around Uxbridge where there are sensitive lands and aquifers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54217

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Trying to live in an area surrounded by gravel pits is becoming harder and harder to enjoy. There is enough truck traffic, enough dust and contaminates in the air now and enough noise coming from two nearby pits to disrupt anyone's life. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54227

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to ask that you do not release the land in this Application from the existing license and that you hold Miller Paving to the original rehabilitation plan for which fill is not required. In addition I have so many questions and comments! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54239

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have been a neighbour of the Boyington pit #3 for many years. Please do not permit the removal of 36 hectare of this property from the oversight of the MNRF. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54249

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please remember we have a lot of wells in the area that will be at risk. They will get contaminated and it’s not a matter of if they will, but it’s a matter when. How to fix that ? Who will cover the costs? Can it be repaired after it’s to late? Lire davantage