Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81029

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on proposed changes to the Planning Act as outlined in ERO 019-6197 and as related to Bill 23, the proposed More Homes Built Faster Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81065

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It's disenguous to suggest that the housing crisis can be fixed by allowing granny tiny homes to be built in the backyard, which is basically what this is about. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81071

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

AMO’s Submission to Proposed Changes to Ontario Regulation 299/19: Additional Residential Units AMO Submission to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing on: ERO 019-6197 December 9, 2022   Preamble Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81105

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt is a very important space for all Ontarians. If the Greenbelt is disrupted due to development, there will be irreparable harm to the ecosystems and the wildlife that live there. We will never be able to get those ecosystems in the habitat for sensitive organisms back. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81127

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to section 019-6197 of bill 23. It will remove thousands of hectares of valuable land previously protected in perpetuity and allow development. It also passes the cost of this infrastructure onto the local taxpayers when it was previously the responsibility of the developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81136

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am in favour of examining an act and making changes to actually help create true affordable housing in existing residential areas, but that is not what is happening here. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81164

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We should scrap Bill 23 and implement real solutions: increase low-rise residential density. Affordable housing near transit and NOT near or on greenbelts is the real solution. Developers can dodge affordability requirements by building outside transit zones. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81188

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are many municipalities who are making good decisions regarding the use of their land. Let the people have their say - not the corporations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81199

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please repeal Bill 23 along with these proposed changes to additional residential units. Additional units need to be built in accordance with local regulations (which also need to be encouraging Sustainability) and not superseding them. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81200

Commentaire fait au nom

Eastern Ontario Landlord Organization

Statut du commentaire

The Eastern Ontario Landlord Organization supports the proposed regulation, and suggests amendments to support additional dwelling units (ADUs), such as a rule about maximum size, a rule about what floors of a building can be used, and Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81212

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Municipalities are the closest form of government to their citizens. And they know their citizens best. Municipalities and Regional Governments must remain the planners, create their own municipals plans (with broad input from citizens and stakeholders) and NOT be superseded by the province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81278

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As someone who had gotten involved in both the City of Brantford and the County of Brant Official Plan, yet you don't even have the respect to approve an official plan submitted in August last year and now you expect to impose staff to re-write to meet your wish list! "This is not democratic! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81294

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I disagree with the premise of all changes proposed on Bill 23. While we may need more homes in Ontario it is important to build them in the right way, in the right place and for the right reason, Bill 23 does none of the above. Lire davantage