Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185042

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Regarding Official Plan Reform: Request more details on how implementation is expected in an upper & lower tier setting such as Essex County where a new OP was recently approved by the Province; Request more information on prescribed uses under the proposed standardized set of land uses; Encourage t Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185043

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Generally supportive of the Building Code review in an effort to modernize and streamline, reduce construction costs, and maintain high health and safety standards.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185047

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Landscape architects should be explicitly recognized as a prescribed profession. They are regulated, accountable practitioners who routinely prepare core components of planning application submissions, and their work directly informs municipal decision‑making. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185049

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a Thunder Bay resident, I have concerns about the Province’s proposed changes to planning processes through Bill 98. I do not support changes that could limit our community’s ability to build sustainably. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185054

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Brampton

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Proposed Planning Act, City of Toronto Act, 2006, Building Code Act, 1992 and Municipal Act, 2001 Changes (Schedules 1, 2 and 7 of Bill 98, the Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026) ERO Posting 026 - 0300 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185057

Commentaire fait au nom

City of London - Planning & Development Department

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Government’s proposed regulatory changes intended to simplify and standardize Official Plans. We appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on this initiative. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185085

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Ontario needs to think toward design and sustainability excellence. The work of landscape architects is crucial toward thoughtful building with climate change challenges in mind. We need to do better, and not sacrifice quality for speed. In this day and age, this is unethical.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185092

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Whitby

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Town of Whitby staff are pleased to provide the following comments in response to ERO Posting # 026-0300 – Proposed Planning Act, City of Toronto Act, 2006, Building Code Act, 1992 and Municipal Act, 2001 Changes (Schedules 1,2 and 7of Bill 98, the Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrast Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185097

Commentaire fait au nom

Bruce County

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Comments re: Planning Act Changes to Site Plan control: • Bruce County and its local municipalities have not previously applied broader enhanced development standards through zoning or site plan control. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185116

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Talking about transit: PLEASE, whatever you do, don't take control of transit agencies. If you're implementing a unified fare structure, or 'One Fare 2.0', you must not touch ANYTHING that will cause changes to how much fare revenue transit agencies get. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185121

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I believe this Bill will fundamentally undermine Ontario’s ability to address the impacts of climate change. I oppose amendments to the Planning Act that would prevent municipalities from addressing climate change in official plans. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185143

Commentaire fait au nom

County of Peterborough

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
On behalf of the County of Peterborough, please accept the attached letter and report in response to ERO 026-300. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185144

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
RE: ERO #026-0300 – Proposed Planning Act, City of Toronto Act, 2006, Building Code Act, 1992 and Municipal Act, 2001 Changes (Schedules 1, 2 and 7 of Bill 98, the Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185150

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The proposed changes to specialized transit will decrease efficiency and cause greater barriers to those who require the service. This will not make things better. Please do more research before making a quick decision to implement any changes. Thank you

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185156

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Guelph

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The City of Guelph's comments and recommendations regarding this legislative proposal are attached below. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185169

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I oppose the proposed changes under ERO 026-0300. While Ontario needs more housing and infrastructure, these changes prioritize speed over good planning, environmental protection, and local democracy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

185188

Commentaire fait au nom

Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Wellington-Dufferin Guelph (WDG) Public Health recognizes the intent of the proposed changes for streamlining planning processes and supporting housing delivery across Ontario. Lire davantage