Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

177998

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This idea is not good. Sure bloat can be a bad thing. But these are seperate watersheds and the departments managing them know what they actually require. Reducing the number is only going to reduce the oversight of them resulting in damage to them. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178000

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am very concerned about Act 68, which would consolidate the 36 Conservation Authorities into 7 Regional Conservation Authorities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178001

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Overall, I am concerned about the consolidation of the multiple conservation authorities. I believe this change is happening too fast. More time is needed to engage with local conservation authorities and honour their perspectives. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178002

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not support the governments decision to unnecessarily consolidate conservation authorities. It is a waste of tax payers money and will weaken CA’s ability to properly manage watersheds.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178003

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Part of this proposed area is part of the Haldimand treaty and is land that belongs to Six Nations. Six miles each side of the Grand River. Nothing can be done with these lands without appropriate consultation with the bands of Six Nations as per long standing treaty agreements. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178004

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I question-Ontario’s proposed plan to change or ‘improve’ the conservation authority system(CA), by amalgamating the ‘36’ into 7 regional conservation authorities. It seems another land-grab like the Green Belt fiasco. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178005

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
First, a positive note: It is intently hoped that the new Chief Conservation Executive position and Ontario Provincial Conservation Authorities Agency (OPCAA) can be a new start and a long overdue reinvestment and good faith reengagement in the work of Ontario's conservation authorities by the provi Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178006

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing to you concerns about the provincial plans to amalgamate the current 36 conservation authorities into only seven. This was proposed on October 31st by Ontario's Ministry of Environment, Conservation, and Parks. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178007

Commentaire fait au nom

Friends of Second Marsh

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Friends of Second Marsh (FSM) is requesting that the Ontario government pause the amalgamation of the 36 conservation authorities into seven regional conservation authorities as proposed in ERO #025-1257. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178008

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Consolidation of public services has historically resorted in worse services. This is a terrible idea proposed by a terrible government and should be avoided at all costs.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178009

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
If this is the case “No changes would be proposed to the overall extent of conservation authority jurisdiction within the province, and under consolidation the new regional conservation authorities would remain independent organizations operating with municipal governance and oversight” Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178010

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I have previously worked in a position which required me to that confirm permits being issued under my authority were not contrary to law, including the conservation authorities act. Many of these permits were in various conservation authorities which had differing policies and standards. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178011

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Why HCA is is Not Supporting the Proposed Merger - and neither do I! The Province has not provided evidence showing why the merger is needed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178012

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my concern regarding the proposed amalgamation of the Sault Ste. Marie Region Conservation Authority (SSMRCA) into a new Northeastern Ontario Regional Conservation Authority and urge the Province to consider maintaining local presence in this small, isolated region. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178014

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We do not want or support this amalgamation proposal!! Taking the local knowledge away would be a huge mistake that can't be mitigated from hundreds to thousands of kilometres away. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178015

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Land stewardship is very important and holds value. With ski trails, bike trails backcountry canpimg and hiking. The consolidation would make the process less valuable and would have little connection to what is actually happening in the area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178016

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
To the Government of Ontario, As a citizen of Ontario and a professional in the environmental field I oppose this proposal to consolidate the regional conservation authorities. I oppose this proposal for the following reasons: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

178017

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I vehemently disagree with the government’s proposed changes to the Conservation Authorities Act. The proposed Lake Erie Regional Conservation Authority — covering 8 conservation authorities and 81 municipalities — is much too large to remain responsive and effective. Lire davantage