Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95382

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Re ERO #019-8010 CRH Canada Group Inc. I am not sure why CRH’s formal Proposal is not available online, on the Environmental Registry website. I am therefore commenting on CRH’s Plain Language Summary handout provided at their open house on December 6, 2023. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95391

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I have lived in the Clarkson area for over 50 years. This area has grown substantially over the years, and continues to do so. The quality of our air has always been an issue with the various industries located in our area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95408

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
They had five years to comply with new environmental standards. At the 11th hour they state they cannot comply and ask for another seven years? Even considering an extension is ridiculous. Where is the corporate responsibility with this enterprise? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95411

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hello, Would like to know what the short-term and long-term health effects are to those living in the neighborhood. I've reviewed the Plain Language Summary and these details aren't adequately addressed. Please assist with clarifying/elaborating. Thanks!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95538

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
To the best of my knowledge, there has been no communication (written, meetings) with the community about this proposal. Surely, there must be a requirement for communication, particularly if the Approval includes the addition of new or previously unapproved sources of emissions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95678

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This just seems soooo wrong! Why is a country like Canada lagging so far behind countries like Germany in reducing sulphur and nitrogen emissions? 10 more years of Ash Grove Cement emissions beyond acceptable levels should not be happening. Let's take better care of our environment!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95713

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
On the Ash Grove site specific standard, I am against the allowance of a 10 year implementation period. I am concerned that in another 10 years or less the standards will change and they will still be behind. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95716

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a Mississauga resident and am appalled that the government would even consider offering Ash Grove an extension on emissions that far exceed the levels safe for the atmosphere and our health. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95718

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Moving target shouldn't be an excuse for the bad work of Ashgrove. How we measures emissions change its like when I don't a car emissions test. What would have passed before the car fails now. . . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95748

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a neighbour of the cement factory, I would like it on the record that I do not agree to allowing this company any exemptions or modifications to controlled emissions of toxic chemicals if it means more chemicals in my environment. These chemicals have serious health repercussions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95751

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It absolutely rediculous that this is even being considered. They had been given PLENTY of time to correct their emissions output and disregarded it. Now AFTER the final day of change they are asking for more time? How rediculous! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95752

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am strongly against Ash Grove proceeding with releasing harmful chemicals into the air as it is extremely harmful to humans. This can cause severe respitory problems in both adults and children and can worsen when exercising. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95753

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a resident of Clarkson, and am writing to express my strong opposition to the application submitted by CRH Canada Group, as outlined in ERO Notice No. 019-8010, requesting an exception to increase operational pollution. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95757

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to increasing these emissions. We do not know what the long term impacts are on our health and this is a family oriented community. The emissions should be cut down not increased. Ash grove has a poor record when it comes to environmental impacts. How can they be trusted? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95758

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I would like to think in this current climate of environmental awareness that any request to increase pollutants would be denied. This does not appear to comply or support Canadians commitment to achieving net-zero emissions. Lire davantage