Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

141848

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Focus major development on infertile land, do not destroy our forests, farmland, conservation areas as they are very important to our survival along with protecting endangered species. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

142328

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
People have worked hard to advocate for bird friendly design in municipal building codes. Toronto in particular is on a major bird migratory route and is a hotspot for bird strikes on our glass heavy building designs. Bird Friendly glass is often even made in Ontario creating jobs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

142812

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
"Exempting approvals for municipal agreements and ancillary TOC project agreements: Order In Council approval is required to enter into agreements, which can slow down execution. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

142955

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I have been a resident of Ontario all of my life and I strongly oppose this governmental overreach regarding economic development in our cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144885

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Removal of approvals in decision-making is a sign of exclusion of the people and parties that are most impacted by the expansion. At no cost can we allow any organization to have full authority to make changes that impact real people and communities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

145628

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Argument Against Bill 17 Bill 17 should not be passed because it prioritizes speed and developer interests over meaningful public consultation, environmental protection, and equitable community development. 1. Undermines Public Consultation and Local Democracy Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

148507

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to the proposed changes to environmental protection. Existing rules need to be followed for due process

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149323

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Transit is important but environmental assessments should not be reduced.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149355

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
First a name change - Building faster is not building smarter, change it to "building faster and dumber act" Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149366

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Regarding Bill 17. This is such a short sighted, greedy bill being proposed by our current government. There are far better and longer lasting avenues to create jobs and prosperity within Ontario that are much less harmful and more profitable than what this government is proposing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149372

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Removing the requirement for wind studies in Bill 17, specifically "Wind: information and material related to the potential impacts of a proposed development on wind conditions in surrounding areas." may place pedestrians in uncomfortable and dangerous situations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149380

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Oakville

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Detailed Town of Oakville Comments can be found in the attachment. For detailed feedback on the broader definition of “provincial transit project”, please refer to comments provided relevant to Schedule 5 of the Metrolinx Act section. Schedule 5 of the Metrolinx Act: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149384

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am concerned that municipalities will no longer have the automatics ability to have developers submit studies for traffic, shade/sun and wind studies as a condition for a "complete application". Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149385

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
My comment is regarding the revisions to the Building Code Act which would in turn eliminate 'Green Standards' enacted at the municipal level. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149408

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Mississauga

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please find attached the city of Mississauga's comments on proposed modifications. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149420

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Municipalities need local tools to ensure they have climate-safe housing that fits their community. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149422

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I'm opposed to this bill which undermines well-established planning regulations that protect individuals and communities from predatory developers. I also oppose its implications for building energy-efficient housing which is essential to achieving a sustainable climate. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149478

Commentaire fait au nom

Regional Municipality of Durham Region

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please note that these comments are being submitted on behalf of staff from the Regional Municipality of Durham Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149489

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Urban Forest Council

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Ontario Urban Forest Council urges the Province to revise Bill 17 before it proceeds further. While we support the goal of increasing affordable housing, this legislation, as drafted, will severely weaken the tools municipalities use to protect and expand urban forests. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149491

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This Bill needs a lot of work before it should be allowed to pass. • Changing the definition of TOC is not clear. How can I trust that the Conservative government will create TOCs where they are actually needed vs where they just want or their developers want? Lire davantage