Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

175652

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
While disagree with the knee jerk reaction to oppose any new development, I think this project needs to address several issues: • The scale of the project is too large for the area in question. A scaled down version (about a half) would be much better to provide the necessary housing. Read more

Comment ID

175661

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have lived in southeast Oakville since 1981 and love it here. The only negative at the moment is difficulty in getting out of this subdivision. Having the lake on one side and the QEW and railroad track on the other is very restrictive. Read more

Comment ID

175784

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Minister of Infrastructure, As an Oakville resident leaving nearby Oakville GO station, I am strongly opposing your four Zoning Orders to force the Transit-Oriented Community onto Town of Oakville.   Read more

Comment ID

175874

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You will be met with immense backlash from Oakville residents. Awareness of the unconstrained density is growing. This will cost Mr Ford in the next election. It is shameful the level of density with limited infrastructure when we are already meeting our housing build requirements.

Comment ID

175885

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I absolutely cannot believe Oakville would be considering building high-rise condos in mid-town. The traffic is already a nightmare in Oakville with all the new condos that have been built over the last several years and all the new housing in north Oakville. Read more

Comment ID

175897

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Totally against this MZO. Way to dense and dies not fit with the Oakville’s vision for the Town’s growth. I support the Town of Oakville proposal for the site. Thank you.

Comment ID

175972

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is just ridiculous to have province use its power unnecessarily to force the development of TOC in Oakville. I believe the province insiders would like to see Oakville as Golden Gosse. Read more

Comment ID

176013

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I a local Oakville resident writing to formally object to the current proposal for the Oakville GO Transit-Oriented Community (TOC), specifically regarding the extraordinary density levels proposed and the demonstrable lack of coordinated infrastructure planning necessary to support such growth. Read more

Comment ID

176019

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Absolutely no to this project. Oakville's infrastructure will be overwhelmed by this density. We don't want overcrowding like they have in Mississauga. We want to maintain our standard of living and it is already becoming too crowded. There is no need or desire for this. Read more

Comment ID

176206

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This intended zoning order will only continue to overburden arteries and creaking infrastructure. We need new roads , highways and piblic transit that works (not like Metrlincx). Oakville is already grinding to a halt like most of the GTA. Read more

Comment ID

176269

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
OPA 70 is the preferred plan for Midtown according to Oakville Residents Associations, Town of Oakville Planning Staff, and a unanimous vote of the Oakville Town Council. Read more

Comment ID

176270

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed plan is a disaster. It disregards the character of Oakville and would make it harder for current residence to access transit as the traffic by Oakville gas station would make it impossible to reach in a timely manner. Read more

Comment ID

176280

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The TOC proposal is offering far too many one bedroom condos, proved to be unpopular in the Toronto area. What is needed is accommodation for families with amenities such as nearby schools and parks, a well designed community such as that proposed by our Oakville Town Read more

Comment ID

176298

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I wanted to comment against the proposed development. The access roads in the area of the sites considered are already jammed as you try to access to Go Station in the morning or afternoon rush hours. Imagine what a nightmare would be when there are 11 high-rise building are added to the mix. Read more

Comment ID

176302

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Oakville’s OPA 70, unanimously adopted by council and the mayor, reflects a viable livable proposed community located adjacent and at the GO Station. The province’s proposed MZOs significantly exceed OPA 70 urban planning densities. Read more

Comment ID

176330

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Buildings that are skyscrapers are not appropriate for a community outside of our large urban cities. In Oakville we need more low-rise affordable housing in walkable hubs where food retail and services are co-located not congested high rise towers that crush the capacity of the infrastructure. Read more