Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71221

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It is clear Ontario needs more housing. However, there are currently developments slated outside the Greenbelt that have yet to be completed. The scarcity of supplies and skilled labour to complete these current projects should prevent the Ontario government from severing protected land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71222

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please don’t do this. Please take care of our planet and respect the earth. This project is pure evil destruction. There is absolutely no need for it- other than to make rich people richer which is disgusting. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71230

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Giving away prime farm land for development would cost Ontarian long term in term of food and clean water security. Government should instead encourage landowners within the greenbelt to invest into agriculture to ensure food and clean water security for Ontarians for years to come. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71231

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is a terrible idea. Housing can be out without ruining the Greenbelt. The government’s assertion that this is needed to spur housing development is laughable. If the government ended exclusionary zoning like was recommended by the housing task force then we would not need any new land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71239

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This seems ill-advised, environmentally short-sighted, and nakedly capitalistic/opportunistic for Doug Ford to curry more favour with the developers he’s in bed with. I’d rather the green belt be left alone. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71244

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is a total abuse of power. It will destroy every species at risk to line a few developer pockets. I hope this proposal is fought tooth and nail.by Ontarians. The natural heritage of this province will cease to exist.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71254

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
There has never been a more important time in history to protect green spaces for the health and well-being of all individuals on this planet. Take land out of the greenbelt is incredibly short sighted and immensely damaging and is a drastic overreach of government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71258

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This government and the Primier promised the people of Ontario that they would not touch the Greeenbelt. It is recognized that there is a need for additional housing, but there is no reason for that to come at the expense of environmental protection. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71262

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is the only available wildlife/green space for most GTA residents and it will not even solve any housing issues. The increase in sprawl will actively deteriorate our quality of life. We need density, not sprawl.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71263

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
More homes do need to be built faster, but not at the expense of our precious Greenbelt. We have countless other options, and interrupting this tract of protected land is short-sighted and wrong-minded. Lire davantage