Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32755

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Policies always sound great but it's how they will be implemented that concerns me. Reducing barriers and red tape usually means make it easier for developers to make money at the expense of the environment. Barriers and "red tape" were put there for a reason. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32756

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Under section 3, you propose to "Direct large ground-mounted solar facilities away from prime agricultural and specialty crop areas." I think I understand some technical reasons - shading & rain water redirection. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32770

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We should ensure developers build affordable prices units next to higher priced builds. Right now we are awash in 500k+ suburban houses but not a single unit goes up next door or across the road for a reasonable price. We have to enforce a mix.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32793

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The city I live in has many abandoned buildings. Rundown older homes, plazas and even old factory's sitting empty. They are taking up much-needed space for affordable housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32853

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There should not be any increased housing land on forested and/or protected areas like the Oakridges Moraine, for example. It is our understanding that there is plenty of land for housing, which does not interfere with the protection of forests and moraines and aquifers.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33121

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a resident and work in Markham within York Region and traffic has been a major issue and is becoming worse. With the projected populations in 2030 for York Region, I can only foresee an event more gridlock. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33127

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hi, Can you please produce a version of the PPS that illustrates the changes that have been made and let me know when it will be on line and where I can find it THX Stephen

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33312

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

stop what you're doing and listen to advocates and people who know. the issue is not with supply-- Toronto has more condos in development than any other city in North America. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33488

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Proposals for the building of so-called "tiny" homes are something that I have long advocated for. This point seems to have been addressed in the new Policy Statement. A return to the post WWII housing of the "two-up, two-down" type is greatly needed, as well as other small home types. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33545

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Housing developments should be limited to currently-developed land. Infill of urban spaces, and re-purposing and refurbishing of vacant/abandoned buildings in urban centres - NOT sprawl into undeveloped, rural land which should be reserved for nature. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33546

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

You need to define what "Net increase" means when discussing settlement area expansions outside of a comprehensive review. Adding land to your settlement area, regardless of size, always results in a net increase. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33560

Commentaire fait au nom

Mulmur Township

Statut du commentaire

• It is unclear as to the extent that Part II wording may impact Council decision making. The implications of this new wording should be further discussed with respect to Council’s ability to decline from entering into agreements, such as responsibility agreements for communal servicing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33610

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hi, as a recently graduated community planner, currently conducting an internship, I have some suggestions to make the PPS clearer and more useful: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33616

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not understand how you can cut conservation authority flood funding in half and then turn around and say we need to focus on our core mandate. Please tell me how this makes sense? Lire davantage