Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54332

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
From my understanding Miller Group has not been playing by the rules and seems to have been ignoring them to a great deal. It is time for the MNRF to enforce the applicable rules and not grant any changes of use to this property. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54334

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Millar has a terrible track record of following policy. What makes you think this time is different? Why is the MNRF releasing responsibility and putting the decision making on Uxbridge? This reminds me of the handling of the Greenbank Airport mismanagement. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54336

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Neither the province nor the township should approve the proposal from Miller Paving. As a local resident, we live with noise, dust, increased traffic and undoubtedly additional pollution from the existing operations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54339

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Return this pit to it’s original form. We do not harmful waste to be deposited causing harm to water system & general environment. It has been used for its purpose now return it to its natural form!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54340

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I object to Miller’s applications. First, for years Miller has not only broken the rules by developing a contractor’s yard but have refused to comply with the Ministry’s request to remove it. More importantly, I believe it is critical that lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine be protected. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54342

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The proposed large (10,000 sq. ft.) building and large equipment storage yard for the Miller Boyington Pit #3 are completely out of character with current zoning and land use on the lands surrounding the subject property. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54343

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
In response to questions regarding the anticipated heavy increased truck traffic from those vehicles hauling fill to the Miller Boyington Pit #3, members of Uxbridge Council suggested that a solution might be to widen the road from the Goodwood Road to the pit entrance to allow for the creation of a Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54348

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a concerned resident of Uxbridge that doesn’t want Miller paving to be able to bring more trucks and fill into our beautiful area. I believe that by approving this, it opens up the possibility for more companies to change the terms that they have with the township and the MNRF. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54349

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
A review of the license under which the removal of material from the Miller Boyingtom Pit #3 is permitted indicates that a contractor’s yard was never authorized within the terms of the original license. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54350

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a resident in the area, 5 minute drive away, I advocate for this site to be returned to natural state. The water quality in the area is important as folks in the area are on well water and would not want any industrial activity to endanger that.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54351

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The five main access routes into the Uxbridge town centre are (Concession 7/Main Street South from the south, Bloomington/Toronto Street from the west, Durham 8/Brock Street West from the west, Durham 1/Main Street North from the north, and Durham 47/Brock Street East to the east. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54354

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Concerns regarding the Miller Paving application: * the environmental impact would negatively affect generations * it sets a precedent for other aggregate companies * it affects the health and safety of the community as a result of the increased transportation of unknown fill Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54355

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a local resident and am extremely disappointed and concerned with the possible amendment to the the Miller Boyington Pit #3. This will, in no way, result in any positive outcomes for the Town of Uxbridge or the people who live close to this area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54356

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Historically, much of the excess soil excavated from construction sites in the City of Toronto and adjacent areas has been deposited into the lake along the shoreline of Lake Ontario to create new areas for development and new parkland sites. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54362

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my serious concerns over the proposed site plan amendment put forward in regards to the Miller Boyington Pit #3. Please do not grant Miller’s application to move 36 hectares of land from MNFR oversight to become the responsibility of the Township of Uxbridge. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

54363

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Comments are in regards to: The Township Application requests for continued use of a non-permitted contractor’s yard, removal of the asphalt plant from MNRF oversight, a new 40,000 sq ft industrial building, and importing 1 million cubic meters of fill. Lire davantage