Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172995

Commentaire fait au nom

Asset Management and Capital Planning Division of the City of Peterborough

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The City of Peterborough Asset Management and Capital Planning Division is deeply concerned that Schedule 5 of Bill 60 would unnecessarily limit a municipality’s ability to effectively manage its own transportation network. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

172998

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is terrible idea. Ontarians need different forms of transportation to suit their need. By blanket removing municipalities ability to install bike lanes without provincial approval, you limiting our freedom and make us less safe while doing nothing to solve transit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173001

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose the proposed bill that would prohibit municipalities from reducing motor vehicle traffic lanes when installing, implementing, or marking new bicycle lanes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173005

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a driver, voter and taxpayer, I find this legislation appalling. It is regressive and will make the lives of Ontarians worse without any of the claimed benefits. Not all road users are in cars, and public policy should reflect that. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173008

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This bill is exceedingly irresponsible. I do not even use a bike but I firmly oppose this bill. This bill is designed to put the lives of cyclists and pedestrians in danger; it will not even do anything to reduce traffic delays. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173020

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It has not been proven that lane vehicle lane reductions is causing more congestion. Building more roads causes more congestion. Building more bike lanes will encourage more people to get out of their cars and onto their bikes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173024

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hello, I'm a commuting cyclist and I love cycling in Toronto when streets have protected bike lanes. I want to take my 65+ year old parents cycling around Toronto or hopping on and off the TTC. We can stop by many of restaurants and cafe in Toronto. I want to bike to work. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173025

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This act is a gross over-reach by the province. Let the Premier try to walk his grandchildren along the speedy streets that he wishes to create and he will be terrified. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173028

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Cycling lanes saved lives. They prevent aggressive drivers from mixing it up with cyclists. Cycling is green energy and should be promoted and protected. Removing cycling lanes is painting targets on the back of cyclists. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173033

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This bill is a terrible idea. It is yet another incursion into territory that should be reserved for local municipal government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173036

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am not sure why this government keeps attacking bike lanes and their use. Vision Zero should be a goal of the entire province and this can only be achieved by providing safe facilities for vulnerable road users including pedestrians, people with disabilities and cyclist. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173047

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It feels a bit like beating an old drum of the ghost of last year but here we are. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173055

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I deeply oppose this bill, especially with bike-lanes being prevented.... This does NOT move ontario towards a more sustainable future and only harms our citizens more. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173065

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please stop this bill! I cycle every day and a lot of my ride is extremely dangerous. Rush hour along Dundas, Queen and DuPont streets are frightening. When there are no parked cars, people drive like they are on the 401. I understand why most people don’t bike. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173066

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We need access to more bike lanes to encourage and promote a variety of transportation options in this city. We need safer streets, which bike lanes support. The premier is ignoring the facts.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173073

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
A Bill like 60 is dangerous and counter productive. Short sighted, short term perceived gains harm our future. Building sustainably, sensibly and resiliently does not happen in a hurry. Rushed projects typically benefit a very small demographic, ones that are already wealthy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173074

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
In 2019, nearly half of Torontonians—44%—cycled to work, school, or to run errands. Add another 26% who ride for fun or exercise, and over two-thirds of the city’s residents are hopping on a bike. In neighbourhoods with protected bike lanes, cycling is even more common. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173084

Commentaire fait au nom

SDG Counties

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
SDG Counties does not support the proposed prohibition of removing vehicle lanes based on provincial regulations. Removing vehicle lanes on municipal roads is a local decision and the proposed regulations add unnecessary hurdles to proper transportation planning. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

173086

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a proud Ontarian who STRONGLY OPPOSES BILL 60. This Bill threatens housing stability by fast-tracking evictions and weakening tenant protections, making easier for landlords to raise rents, and severely limiting the rights to appeal. Lire davantage